FOR PILOT OWNERS AND PLATFORM LEADS

Enterprises.

Transformation does not stall on strategy. It stalls the first time someone has to sign off on a cutover — and the name on that approval is yours.

Show us the system Read the method

ZeroCORE OUTAGES IN TRANSITION

10M+CUSTOMERS ON MODERNISED CORES

40%LOWER RUN-COST

90%FASTER DEPLOYMENT

01 — WHAT IS ACTUALLY ON THE LINE

The company survives a failed programme. The sponsor does not.

Big-bang rewrites take years, and the ones that fail rarely fail quietly

Modernisation that risks live operations puts the outage on your name, not the vendor's

Compliance and audit treated as an afterthought turn a delivery problem into a regulatory one

Vendor lock-in and cloud spend that balloons unchecked become your line item to explain

Change the organisation never adopts still counts as money spent

02 — HOW WE KEEP PRODUCTION UP

The legacy path stays live until the new one has earned the traffic.

Strangler patterns and staged rollouts — nothing is switched off before its replacement has carried real load

Rollback-ready releases: every cutover has a way back that has been tested, not assumed

Increments small enough that no single release can take the core down

Target architecture documented so your board and your auditors can defend it without us in the room

03 — WHAT YOUR AUDITORS GET

Agreed upfront, not retrofitted after a review.

01

Audit and regulatory sign-off

Designed in from day one and agreed with risk and audit before build — SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and sector mandates included.

02

Data residency

Settled before the architecture is drawn, not after a review flags it.

03

Run cost

Every milestone carries an explicit FinOps run-cost target, not just a delivery date.

04

Ownership

We embed, set standards, then transfer. The operating model is documented for the handover.

Bring the constraint your last vendor could not work inside.

Audit windows, data residency, a change freeze, an incumbent SI. The constraint is the brief.

Start the conversation →

04 — HOW THE CUTOVER RUNS

TRAFFIC LEAVES THE LEGACY RAIL IN STAGES · THE UPTIME LINE NEVER BREAKS

05 — ONE CORE THAT STAYED UP

A legacy core, modernised without an outage.

BANKING Global Banking Group: Legacy Core Modernization The estate mapped, the target architecture agreed with risk and audit, then cut over in increments that could each be rolled back.

WHO WE HAVE SHIPPED WITH

Regulated and enterprise teams we have shipped with.

05 — THE SEQUENCE

How a programme actually runs.

01 — Assess & Baseline

Map the estate, score risk and tech debt, quantify the cost of the status quo against the opportunity

02 — Target Architecture

A cloud-ready, compliance-by-design architecture the board can stand behind

03 — Incremental Migration

Strangler patterns, zero-downtime cutovers, rollback-ready releases

04 — Govern & Operate

Embed FinOps, SRE and governance so velocity, reliability and cost stay on target

06 — WHAT THE COMMITTEE WILL ASK

The questions you will be asked, and the answers.

Will this disrupt live operations?

No. Strangler-fig patterns and rollback-ready deployments keep customer-facing systems running throughout — zero core outages in transition to date.

How are regulatory, audit and data-residency requirements handled?

Designed in from day one and agreed with your risk and audit teams upfront — SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and sector mandates included.

Are you replacing our internal teams?

Augmenting and uplifting them. We embed, set standards, then transfer ownership.

How is cloud and run cost controlled?

Every roadmap carries a FinOps model with explicit run-cost targets tied to milestones, so cost is a commitment rather than an outcome.

What size engagement do you take?

From one critical platform to a multi-year, enterprise-wide programme.

You do not need another strategy deck. You need the cutover to be uneventful.

Show us the system you cannot afford to take down, and the constraints you are working inside.

Talk to us →